Home

Go Back   .: XT660.com - The #1 XT660 Resource :. > XT660Z T�n�r� > XT660Z T�n�r� Tech Section > XT660Z Exhausts
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Main site

Google

XT660Z Exhausts Available exhusts for the new Tenere

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  # 1  
Old 13-12-09, 21:37
Drzee Drzee is offline
Newbie XT-Moto
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sussex
Posts: 11
Drzee is on a distinguished road
Leo Vince or other pipe?

Can anyone who has fitted a new pipe confirm what difference, if any, that a new pipe such as the Leo Vince does to the fluffy low down power of the Tenere? Or is this the character of the XT660 engine and not much can be done about the way the low down power comes in?

Thanks

Simon
  # 2  
Old 13-12-09, 23:27
firestorm_al firestorm_al is offline
Expert XT-Moto
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: z
Posts: 86
firestorm_al is on a distinguished road
I fitted my Leo Vince cans a couple of weeks ago. I was quite surprised how light the standard can was considering how heavy the cans on my XT660X were.

I prefer them with the baffles in. The most noticable thing for me was they seem to have smoothed out the low rev response of the engine so low speed response seems better.

Al.
  # 3  
Old 13-12-09, 23:37
jiauka jiauka is offline
Expert XT-Moto
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 146
jiauka is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drzee View Post
Can anyone who has fitted a new pipe confirm what difference, if any, that a new pipe such as the Leo Vince does to the fluffy low down power of the Tenere?
No, I have them fitted, and I have evolved from the pipes, snorkel removal, DNA filter fitted and a kind of Kev mod, the best overall gain comes from the snorkel removal+Kev mod. 2nd is DNA filter and 3rd -and most expensive- is the exhaust.

My advice, don't do it before going the "intake way", there is no gain, not even in weight (just about 1kg).

have fun,

j.
  # 4  
Old 14-12-09, 10:21
tripletom tripletom is offline
XT-Moto SuperStar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lower New Inn
Posts: 763
tripletom is on a distinguished road
I would recommend you fitted some form of fuelling modification if you are running the LVs. On a dyno run my stoichiometric ratio was a very lean 14:1. Not good.
  # 5  
Old 14-12-09, 13:48
firestorm_al firestorm_al is offline
Expert XT-Moto
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: z
Posts: 86
firestorm_al is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripletom View Post
I would recommend you fitted some form of fuelling modification if you are running the LVs. On a dyno run my stoichiometric ratio was a very lean 14:1. Not good.
Did they take into account the clean air system on the bike or disable it for the dyno run as I believe that it can lead to a false CO2 figure making the bike seem to be running leaner than it actually is?

Al.
  # 6  
Old 14-12-09, 17:18
tripletom tripletom is offline
XT-Moto SuperStar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lower New Inn
Posts: 763
tripletom is on a distinguished road
I don't know to be honest Al, the sniffer went down the silencer, they did a few short runs and then did a power run before giving me my print out. I'll have to find out from my dyno knowing mate how much the dynojet dynos are off so I can get a more realistic figure power wise.
  # 7  
Old 15-12-09, 20:55
Drzee Drzee is offline
Newbie XT-Moto
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sussex
Posts: 11
Drzee is on a distinguished road
Thanks for all the replies.

Has anyone told their insurance company about the Kev mod? And what did they say?

Cheers

Simon
  # 8  
Old 09-01-10, 03:32
stuxtttr stuxtttr is offline
XT-Moto SuperStar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lutterworth/Midlands
Posts: 446
stuxtttr is on a distinguished road
just a quote from london biker :

Boosting the stock power from 46bhp up to almost 52bhp, these exhausts also produce an incredible extra 16% torque - which in laymans language means a big hike in the power band from 2600rpm - right up to 7200rpm, the biggest increase being in that much used mid-range 3800-4400 rev band, where the stock power flattens out.

Can anyone confirm if this is the case with the pipes fitted as standard and no other fueling or engine mods.

I suspect its a load of ballony but it would be interesting to know all the same.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

  XT660         Archive   Main site


Footer
vBSkinworks Top