Quote:
Originally Posted by
retryrider
Hello,
Sorry this may seem like an odd comparison.
|
well it is... I used to own a Yamaha MT-03
and a XT660Z Tenere and now own a KTM 690 Enduro.
A XT660Z Tenere vs KTM 690 Enduro does make sense...
...or a MT-03 vs KTM 690 Duke does make sense.
Before buying the MT-03 I also test drove a 690 Duke.
Quote:
I'm looking to get a new/used XT660Z but having a lot of trouble finding a demo one. My local dealear suggested I try out the KTM Duke as it has a similar single cyclinder engine.
After an hours ride out the KTM seems like a really fun bike, very puncy off the line but at higher speeds (60MPH+) the vibrations coming through the handlebars would seem to great for comfortable long distance travelling also in order to keep the KTM responsive at these speeds I had to stay in a lower gear which made the vibrations even worse.
Has anyone got experience of both bikes and can offer a comparison or are the points I mentioned a trait of all single cylinder bikes?
Thanks in advance |
The KTM LC4 690 is quite a bit different then the Yamaha 660 engine. In short: the KTM aims at 'sport' while the Yamaha aims for 'comfort and endurance'.
That is why the KTM is viby (less balancing weight), rev's up quickly (lighter flywheel), a 'two stage' power curve (felt the power kick at 5000rpm?) and a bit twitchy on the thottle (unless you put the mapping on 'soft') and needs to be ridden with some dedication: keep the revs up.
That is why the Yamaha feels so smooth (for a big single), revs up without to much hurry, has lots of bottom power and is easier to ride: it will toddle along and pull you through any time. An aftermarket slip on muffler, K&N filter and Kev-mod will make it more ... uhm... lively!
So if you want a sporty ride: go KTM. If you want long distance touring: go Yamaha.
Sure you can try to make a tourer out of a KTM, or an athlete out of the Yamaha but it will always show its true nature...
HJ