.: XT660.com - The #1 XT660 Resource :.

.: XT660.com - The #1 XT660 Resource :. ( https://www.xt660.com/index.php)
-   Preparing Your Bike For a Long Distance Trip ( https://www.xt660.com/forumdisplay.php?f=123)
-   -   Washboard roads - Question for JMo ( https://www.xt660.com/showthread.php?t=10426)

Old Git Ray 18-05-09 23:38

Washboard roads - Question for JMo
 
I was going to PM this but thought others may want to know...

Hi JMo,

Welcome back.

I have a quick question re the Tenere front suspension.

You have mentioned a couple of times that the front end of the Ten struggles with the washboard roads. Iv'e been to Africa a few times and know what they are like and how to drive them but I have only done it thus far in a car and landrover.

What exactly is it the the Ten does (or doesn't do) when working hard on the washboard ?
When you are riding it, are you riding it particulary aggressively or just fast enough to ride over the ridges and make it tolerable ?

Ray

For those that are wondering what I am on about, on many dirt roads the suspension and tyres on lorries make the surface into a continual series of evenly spaced ridges accross the road, usually a couple of feet apart. If you drive slow in these the vehicle and passengers shake to bits so you have to drive at about 50-60 mph and skim over the tops of the bumps. Scary till you get used to it and concentration levels have to be at max setting.

JMo 19-05-09 15:41

Hi Ray - as you explain, there is a trick to riding washboard which you have summed up pretty well - basically around 50mph seems to be the sweet spot, and the Tenere works well at that sort of speed in most instances...

It's only where the corrugations start to get irregular or deeper than typical grade ripples that it starts to get out of shape, together with faster more irregular surfaced tracks - and it's really only that you feel the suspension bogging down (ie. the damping getting overwhelmed), the geometry keeps the bike stable, it's just the who thing starts to feel saggy and wallowy...

I admit that this tends to only happen are higher than average speeds off road (gotta test the lil' booger you know x), but long continuous stretches will work up a temperature in the suspension - and moreso/quicker if the ambient temp is warm too I imagine - it's not a problem in 'touring' conditions, just something I would want/need to address for the rally bike...

Around 30-40mph the bike is fine, but as you say, this can make it uncomfortable on washboard when you really need to be going slightly faster...

xxx

Bullit 19-05-09 17:54

I tend to think that the faster you go over a washboard road the more comfortable you will be and it will give the suspension less time to react and overheat. Or am I wrong?

I think the shock failures on "The Long way down" was caused by schocks overheating on washboard roads.

JMo 19-05-09 19:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullit (Post 94798)
I tend to think that the faster you go over a washboard road the more comfortable you will be and it will give the suspension less time to react and overheat. Or am I wrong?

No, you are right thinking that, technically that should be the case - only eventually the bike starts to feel soggy regardless... of course that might just be the fact it weighs 180+Kg (plus fuel, plus luggage, plus you) and the suspension specification is 'modest'...

Like I say, for the sort of riding this bike was intended for, it is pretty near perfect out of the crate... it's only if you start to 'push the envelope' to coin a Top-Gun-esque phrase...

All together now, na na na, na na, na na na naaaaaa... na na na, na na na, na na, naaa na naaaaaa...

xxx

Old Git Ray 20-05-09 06:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMo (Post 94776)
Hi Ray - as you explain, there is a trick to riding washboard which you have summed up pretty well - basically around 50mph seems to be the sweet spot, and the Tenere works well at that sort of speed in most instances...

It's only where the corrugations start to get irregular or deeper than typical grade ripples that it starts to get out of shape, together with faster more irregular surfaced tracks - and it's really only that you feel the suspension bogging down (ie. the damping getting overwhelmed), the geometry keeps the bike stable, it's just the who thing starts to feel saggy and wallowy...

I admit that this tends to only happen are higher than average speeds off road (gotta test the lil' booger you know x), but long continuous stretches will work up a temperature in the suspension - and moreso/quicker if the ambient temp is warm too I imagine - it's not a problem in 'touring' conditions, just something I would want/need to address for the rally bike...

Around 30-40mph the bike is fine, but as you say, this can make it uncomfortable on washboard when you really need to be going slightly faster...

xxx

Thanks JMo.

That answers my question well.
I also know what you mean about the bumps getting deeper and irregular. When the sun beats down hard it can be difficult to see the big dips at 50mph and life gets suddenly very interesting when you come across them.

Ray

dommiek 22-05-09 01:11

A good mod that may help here is to reduce the unsprung weight on the front. We all know how heavy the front wheel is....if you could re-lace with an Excell rim and go down to one caliper as on the 660R the weight saving would give the suspension an easier time.

JMo 22-05-09 01:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by dommiek (Post 95230)
A good mod that may help here is to reduce the unsprung weight on the front. We all know how heavy the front wheel is....if you could re-lace with an Excell rim and go down to one caliper as on the 660R the weight saving would give the suspension an easier time.

Good idea Dommiek, although I'd say it's not so much the rim as the hub (and second disc) which is where the weight is... This is certainly something I'm working on x

motonacio 22-05-09 08:42

Why not swap to an R?

It does everything the Z does and copes very well with my local Spanish corrugated dry(ish) river beds, goat-tracks and pot-holed sometimes tarmac sometimes concrete sometimes dirt mountain roads. Karoo rear and Sirac front with Kev mod fork spacers take me (25 stones +) with 29/28 over all terrain (rarely mud).

The road set-up on my UK R - Distancias 30/32 - are very good on UK B roads and hold their own even with the X.

JMo 22-05-09 11:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by motonacio (Post 95247)
Why not swap to an R?

It does everything the Z does and copes very well with my local Spanish corrugated dry(ish) river beds, goat-tracks and pot-holed sometimes tarmac sometimes concrete sometimes dirt mountain roads. Karoo rear and Sirac front with Kev mod fork spacers take me (25 stones +) with 29/28 over all terrain (rarely mud).

Hi Motonacio - I'd agree the R is good dual-sport trail bike (the low slung exhaust not withstanding...), but I'd say there are a number of reasons (a great number depending on the owner I'm sure) you'd choose the Tenere over the XTR - the Tenere has a much larger fuel capacity, better luggage capacity as standard (wide seat, grab handles for lashing bags etc. to), useful weather protection, better rider/passenger ergonomics... and basically, looks just so damn cool too!

As an all-rounder, I'd say the Tenere is just that little more accomplished, and certainly the fueling, ground clearance and general geometry gives the Tenere the edge in the dirt too...

But the last thing I want is to start a tit-for-tat thread - no point in fighting within our own ranks - we'll leave that to the British MPs!

xxx

dommiek 23-05-09 02:05

MP's....no swearing on this forum please...
let me know your ideas on the single disc conversion Jmo; It's a must do mod but comes down to cost at the end of the day

Old Git Ray 23-05-09 09:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by dommiek (Post 95388)
MP's....no swearing on this forum please...
let me know your ideas on the single disc conversion Jmo; It's a must do mod but comes down to cost at the end of the day

Why do you not try just removing one caliper and one disk without changing anything else (i.e, the fork tube -just leave it on) that way the only proper mod would be the brake leads and if you do not like it you can put it back on easily. The weight saving would then be very close to a full conversion and would give you some idea of the benefits without breaking the bank.
I have to say the front brake on the R takes a lot of work to use when compared to the Z but the disks and calipers appear to be the same.

dommiek 23-05-09 22:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Git ray (Post 95393)
Why do you not try just removing one caliper and one disk without changing anything else (i.e, the fork tube -just leave it on) that way the only proper mod would be the brake leads and if you do not like it you can put it back on easily. The weight saving would then be very close to a full conversion and would give you some idea of the benefits without breaking the bank.
I have to say the front brake on the R takes a lot of work to use when compared to the Z but the disks and calipers appear to be the same.

I have considered doing that OGR; at some point I plan to unbolt one of the calipers, wedge some timber between the pads and hook the removed calliper out of the way. By doing this I should be able to judge whether the one remaining caliper is powerful enough on it's own, without having to break into the standard hydraulic system

JMo 25-05-09 15:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by dommiek (Post 95388)
MP's....no swearing on this forum please...
let me know your ideas on the single disc conversion Jmo; It's a must do mod but comes down to cost at the end of the day

Well the cheapest way is to get the spanners out, and just get a single brake hose...?!

The more expensive way will be a new hub/wheel - the 300mm disc will be more than enough I would imagine...

The really expensive way will be a new wheel, new forks, caliper adapter to run the Brembo on a 270mm wave disc...

Hmmmmmm... can ya guess which way I'm going?!

xxx

BadgeStar 25-05-09 18:51

One of the reasons I went from an 'R' to a 'Z' was for the twin disc brakes.
I found the single disc on the 'R' could have been better especially as I usually ride 'two-up'!

Barry.

Old Git Ray 25-05-09 21:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by dommiek (Post 95461)
I have considered doing that OGR; at some point I plan to unbolt one of the calipers, wedge some timber between the pads and hook the removed calliper out of the way. By doing this I should be able to judge whether the one remaining caliper is powerful enough on it's own, without having to break into the standard hydraulic system

Good idea, but do not use wood, it will compress and give you very soggy braking. On top of that, the way that the seal works in the caliper brings the piston back onto its bore very slightly when pressure is released from the brakes (else they would wear out too quick and not release sufficiently). However the resistance (or braking force) should be the same once the slack is taken up but the lever will be further back.

What I am saying is you will need to blank off the redundant caliper completely to get a proper feel.

JMo 25-05-09 21:44

It would be an interesting experiment from a technical point of view perhaps, but it's not really going to have much effect on the overall weight of the bike?

I imagine the reason Yamaha fitted dual discs to the Tenere is they envisage much more two-up and/or with-luggage riding? - and it would seem a bit silly to compromise that for everyday riding?

The only reason I'm changing mine is to fit lighter wheels and stronger (hopefully a little lighter too) suspension as part of a serious upgrade... just taking one disc and caliper off a stock bike seems a bit pointless to me?!

xxx

66T 04-06-10 11:33

I agree, JMo. I think there's a good reason Yamaha designed the braking system the way they did. I'm sure they didn't go to the expense of a twin-disc system for the hell of it.

While it's true that a twin-disc setup is going to affect suspension control in heavy corrugations, imo a fork oil change to a grade heavier will help at least a little.

Again imo, there are few bikes with cost-effective (ie basic, even adjustable) suspension that are happy in those conditions. If the corrugations are serious and prolonged over many kilometres, only quality suspension will cope without complaint. Mucking about with disc limitation and so on suggests that the wrong bike has been bought. Much better to spend money improving the standard suspension than to change the configuration of the bike. The latter is only masking the real issue.

That's my 2 cents worth :blahblah:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:55.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.